UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018

 

OR

 

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to

 

Commission file number: 001-37372

 

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(781) 713-3699

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒  No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒ 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐  No ☒

 

As of July 31, 2018, there were 33,221,704 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical or current facts, such as those under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements discuss our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. These statements may be preceded by, followed by or include the words “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “projection,” “seek,” “may,” “could,” “would,”  “should,” “can,” “can have,” “likely,” the negatives thereof and other words and terms of similar meaning.

 

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions; they are not guarantees of performance. You should not place undue reliance on these statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Although we believe that our assumptions made in connection with the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the assumptions and expectations will prove to be correct.

 

You should understand that the following important factors could affect our future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements:

 

 

In light of these risks and uncertainties, expected results or other anticipated events or circumstances discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (including the exhibits hereto) might not occur. We undertake no obligation, and specifically decline any obligation, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, even if experience or future developments make it clear that projected results expressed or implied in such statements will not be realized, except as may be required by law.

 

These and other risks are described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Those factors and the other risk factors described therein are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results or developments to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

 

 

 

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

 

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

(in thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

1. Nature of Business

 

Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware in April 2002 and then reincorporated in Virginia in July 2014. The Company has its principal operations in Canton, Massachusetts. The Company is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on becoming the leader in responsible pain management by developing and commercializing innovative, differentiated products for people suffering from pain and our communities. The Company’s first product, Xtampza ER®, or Xtampza, is an abuse-deterrent, extended-release, oral formulation of oxycodone, a widely prescribed opioid medication. In April 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approved the Company’s new drug application (“NDA”) filing for Xtampza for the management of pain severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate.  In June 2016, the Company announced the commercial launch of Xtampza.

 

In December 2017, the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Collegium NF, LLC (“Collegium NF”) entered into a Commercialization Agreement with Depomed, Inc. (“Depomed”), pursuant to which Depomed agreed to grant a sublicense of certain of its intellectual property related to Nucynta ER and IR products (the “Nucynta Products”) to the Company for commercialization of the Nucynta Products in the United States. On January 9, 2018, the parties amended the Commercialization Agreement (as amended, the “Commercialization Agreement”) and consummated the transactions contemplated thereby.  Nucynta ER is an extended release formulation of tapentadol that is indicated for the management of pain severe enough to require daily, around the clock, long term opioid treatment, including neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in adults, and for which alternate treatment options are inadequate. Nucynta IR is an immediate release formulation of tapentadol that is indicated for the management of moderate to severe acute pain in adults. The Company began shipping and recognizing product sales on the Nucynta Products on January 9, 2018 and began commercial promotion of the Nucynta Products in February 2018. The assets and liabilities assumed by the Company in connection with the Commercialization Agreement are further described in Note 7.

 

The Company’s operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. The principal risks include inability to successfully commercialize products, changing market conditions for products and product candidates (including development of competing products), changing regulatory environment and reimbursement landscape, litigation related to opioid marketing and distribution practices, inability or delay in completing clinical trials or obtaining regulatory approvals, inability to secure adequate supplies of active pharmaceutical ingredients for each of our products and product candidates, key personnel retention and protection of intellectual property, patent infringement litigation and the availability of additional capital financing on terms acceptable to the Company.

 

The Company has experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operating activities since its inception, and, as of June 30, 2018 had an accumulated deficit of $329,761. The Company expects to continue to incur net losses in the near future. A successful transition to profitable operations is dependent upon achieving a level of revenues adequate to support the Company’s cost structure.

 

The Company believes that its cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2018 together with expected cash inflows from the commercialization of its products, will enable the Company to fund its operating expenses, debt service and capital expenditure requirements under its current business plan for the foreseeable future.

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (a Virginia corporation) as well as the accounts of Collegium Securities Corp. (a Massachusetts corporation), incorporated in December 2015, and Collegium NF, LLC (a Delaware limited liability company), organized in December 2017, both wholly owned subsidiaries requiring consolidation. The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States

(“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

 

In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (consisting of items of a normal and recurring nature) necessary to fairly present the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2018, the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. 

 

When preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, the Company must make estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates in the Company’s financial statements relate to revenue recognition, including the estimates of product returns, units prescribed, discounts and allowances related to commercial sales of its products, estimates utilized in the valuation of inventory, estimates of useful lives with respect to intangible assets, accounting for stock-based compensation, contingencies, intangible assets, and tax valuation reserves. The Company bases estimates and assumptions on historical experience when available and on various factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. The Company’s actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Annual Report”).  

 

Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Company’s Annual Report. There have been no material changes in the Company’s significant accounting policies, other than the adoption of accounting pronouncements below, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Annual Report.

 

Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement

 

In March 2017, the Company entered into a Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement (the “ATM Sales Agreement”), with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., as sales agent (“Cantor Fitzgerald”), pursuant to which the Company may issue and sell, from time to time, through Cantor Fitzgerald, shares of the Company’s common stock, up to an aggregate offering price of $60,000 (the “ATM Shares”).

 

Under the ATM Sales Agreement, Cantor Fitzgerald may sell the ATM Shares by methods deemed to be an “at-the-market” offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), including sales made directly on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, on any other existing trading market for the ATM Shares or to or through a market maker. In addition, under the ATM Sales Agreement, Cantor Fitzgerald may sell the ATM Shares by any other method permitted by law, including in privately negotiated transactions.

 

The Company is not obligated to make any sales of the ATM Shares under the ATM Sales Agreement. The Company or Cantor Fitzgerald may suspend or terminate the offering of ATM Shares upon notice to the other party and subject to other conditions. The Company will pay Cantor Fitzgerald a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the ATM Shares pursuant to the ATM Sales Agreement and has agreed to provide Cantor Fitzgerald with customary indemnification and contribution rights.

 

As of June 30, 2018, the Company had sold an aggregate of 3,126,998 shares at an average gross sales price of $11.36 per share generating net proceeds of $34,283, after deduction of underwriting discounts and commissions and expenses payable by the Company. All shares sold pursuant to the ATM Sales agreement were sold during the year ended December 31, 2017.  The Company did not sell any shares pursuant to the ATM sales agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2018.

 

Advertising and Product Promotion Costs

 

Advertising and product promotion costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and were $5,720 and $2,567 in the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Advertising and product promotion costs were $8,282 and $6,427 in the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Advertising and product promotion costs are expensed as incurred.

 

Restricted Cash 

   

Restricted cash represents cash held in a depository account at a financial institution to collateralize a conditional stand‑by letter of credit related to the Company’s facility lease agreements. The Company no longer has restricted cash as of June 30, 2018.

 

Leases

 

In March 2018, the Company entered into a lease for its new corporate headquarters (the “Lease”) pursuant to which the Company will lease approximately 50,678 of rentable square feet of space, in Stoughton, Massachusetts.  The Lease will commence when the tenant improvements in the space are substantially complete and will continue thereafter for a term of ten years.  The Company has the right to extend the term of the Lease for two additional five-year terms, provided that written notice is provided to the Landlord no later than twelve months prior to the expiration of the current Lease term.  The initial annual base rent is $1,214, or $23.95 per rentable square foot, and will increase annually by 2.5% to 3.1% over the subsequent Lease years. The Lease term will commence upon possession of the new space.  The Company expects to take possession of the new space in the third quarter of 2018.

 

Income Taxes

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not record a current or deferred income tax expense or benefit due to current and historical losses incurred by the Company. The Company's losses before income taxes consist solely of losses from domestic operations. As of June 30, 2018, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets including net operating loss (“NOL”) and tax credit carryovers.  The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA” or “2017 Tax Act”), which was signed into law in December 2017, resulted in significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system. The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, which allows companies the ability to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend more than one year beyond the Tax Act enactment date.  The Company reasonably estimated the effects of the 2017 Tax Act by remeasuring its federal net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2017.  For additional information related to the TCJA and its impact on the Company, please read Note 13, Income Taxes, in the Company’s Annual Report.  Since the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance, this provisional estimate resulted in no impact to the financial statements.  As the Company completes its analysis of the 2017 Tax Act, collects and prepares necessary data, and interprets any additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the IRS, and other standard-setting bodies, it may be required to make adjustments to the original provisional estimate, however the Company has not made any material changes to its provisional estimates during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.  The Company plans to finalize its review and conclusion of the impact of TCJA before year end in accordance with SAB 118 and adjust its provisional estimates as may be required by the TCJA.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

New accounting pronouncements are issued periodically by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective dates.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which amends the guidance for accounting for revenue from contracts with customers.  This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and creates a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.  In 2015, 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued additional ASUs related to Topic 606, including ASUs 2015-14, 2016-08, 2016-10, 2016-12, 2016-20, 2017-13, 2017-14, that delayed the effective date of and clarified various aspects of the new guidance, including principal versus agent considerations, identifying performance obligations, and licensing. The Company adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with

Customers, on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption.  The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, equity or cash flows as of the adoption date or for the three or six months ended June 30, 2018. Refer to Note 3 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" for the required disclosures and a discussion of the Company's policies related to revenue recognition.

 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, and in November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Restricted Cash. The purpose of ASU 2016-15 is to reduce the diversity in presentation and classification of the following items within the Statement of Cash Flows: debt prepayments, settlement of zero coupon debt instruments, contingent consideration payments, insurance proceeds, securitization transactions and distributions from equity method investees. The update also addresses classification of transactions that have characteristics of more than one class of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 requires the Statement of Cash Flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the Statement of Cash Flows. The Company adopted these new standards on January 1, 2018 using the retrospective transition method as required with respect to each period presented. The adoption of these standards did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 most significantly impacts lessee accounting and disclosures. First, this guidance requires lessees to identify arrangements that should be accounted for as leases. Under ASU 2016-02, for lease arrangements exceeding a 12-month term, a right-of-use asset and lease obligation is recorded by the lessee for all leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization/interest expense for financing leases. The balance sheet amount recorded for existing leases at the date of adoption of ASU 2016-02 must be calculated using the applicable incremental borrowing rate at the date of adoption. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for in a manner similar to existing guidance for operating leases. This guidance is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The Company has not chosen early adoption for this ASU and is currently evaluating its effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Based on its preliminary assessment, the Company expects to recognize a right-to-use asset and corresponding lease liability on its balance sheet related to the lease agreement for its corporate headquarters upon adoption of this ASU.

 

 

3. Revenue from Contracts with Customers

 

The Company’s only source of revenue to date has been generated by sales of the Company’s products, which are primarily sold to distributors and retailers (“customers”), which in turn sell the product to pharmacies for the treatment of patients (“end users”).

 

Revenue Recognition

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), the Company recognizes revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes

as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied.

 

Adoption of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

 

The Company adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Under this method, prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted and, as a result, the reported results for 2018 reflect the application of ASC 606 guidance while the reported results for 2017 were prepared under the guidance of ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (“legacy GAAP”). 

 

Immediately prior to the adoption date of January 1, 2018, the Company recognized revenue in accordance with legacy GAAP, or when there was persuasive evidence of an arrangement; when title and risk of loss had passed to the customer; when estimated provisions for chargebacks, rebates, sales incentives and allowances, distribution service fees, and returns were reasonably determinable; and when collectability was reasonably assured. The satisfaction of these criteria generally occurred upon delivery of products to customers, or the sell-in method of revenue recognition under legacy GAAP.  The Company began recognizing revenue on the sell-in method in the third quarter of 2017.  Prior to the third quarter of 2017, the Company recognized revenue when products were dispensed to end users, or the sell-through method of revenue recognition under legacy GAAP, as the Company did not have sufficient experience with product sales to estimate returns at the time product was sold to customers. 

 

As a result of the considerations discussed above, the Company concluded that, as of the adoption date, it would record revenue net of a provision for estimated chargebacks, rebates, sales incentives and allowances, distribution service fees, and returns upon delivery of products to customers under either the sell-in method of revenue recognition under legacy GAAP or under Topic 606 as of the adoption date. Therefore, the adoption of Topic 606 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, equity or cash flows as of January 1, 2018, however, periods presented prior to the third quarter of 2017, when the Company recognized revenue on the sell-through method under legacy GAAP, would be impacted. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company determined that, under Topic 606, the only significant changes to the reported results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 under Topic 606 would be higher product sales of $1,229 and $2,449, respectively, due to the acceleration of revenue recognition for product sales in which recognition was previously deferred due to the fees not being fixed or determinable under the sell-through method under legacy GAAP.

 

Performance Obligations

 

The Company determined that performance obligations are satisfied and revenue is recognized when a customer takes control of the Company’s product, which occurs at a point in time. This generally occurs upon delivery of the products to customers, at which point the Company recognizes revenue and records accounts receivable, which represents the Company’s only contract asset. Payment is typically received 30 to 60 days after satisfaction of the Company’s performance obligations and generally does not have an effect on contract asset and contract liability balances. Under the practical expedients permitted by the rules of the adoption, the Company will expense incremental costs of obtaining a contract as and when incurred if the expected amortization period of the assets is one year or less.

 

Transaction Price and Variable Consideration

 

Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer (“transaction price”). The transaction price for product sales includes variable consideration related to chargebacks, rebates, sales incentives and allowances, distribution service fees, and returns. The Company will estimate the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price under the expected value method.  These estimates take into consideration a range of possible outcomes that are probability-weighted for relevant factors such as the Company’s historical experience, current contractual and statutory requirements, specific known market events and trends, industry data and forecasted customer buying and payment patterns. These provisions reflect the Company’s best estimates of the amount of consideration to which it is entitled based on the terms of the contract.  The amount of variable consideration that is included in the transaction price may be constrained and is included in net sales only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of the cumulative revenue recognized will not occur in a future period.  In general, performance obligations do not include any estimated amounts of variable consideration that are constrained. Actual amounts of consideration ultimately received may differ from the Company’s estimates.  If actual results in the future vary from the Company’s estimates,

the Company will adjust these estimates, which would affect net product revenue and earnings in the period such variances become known. 

 

The following table summarizes activity in each of the Company’s product revenue provision and allowance categories for the six months ended June 30, 2018:

 

 

 

 

 

In addition to the above, the Company also recorded a liability of $22,660  related to sales of Nucynta Products that occurred prior to the closing date of January 9, 2018 which the Company is liable for under the terms of the Commercialization Agreement. This assumed liability, representing $22,406 of assumed rebates and incentives and $254 of assumed trade allowances and chargebacks, was recorded as a component of the intangible asset acquired as of the closing date of January 9, 2018.

 

As of June 30, 2018, the Company did not have any transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations and any costs to obtain contracts with customers, including pre-contract costs and set up costs, were immaterial.

 

Disaggregation of Revenue

 

Product revenues, net consisted of the following:

 

 

 

4. Loss per Common Share

 

The following table presents the computations of basic and dilutive net loss per share:

 

The following potentially dilutive securities, which represent all outstanding potentially dilutive securities, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share due to their anti-dilutive effect (in common stock equivalent shares):

 

 

 

5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Disclosures of fair value information about financial instruments are required, whether recognized in the Balance Sheet or not, for financial instruments with respect to which it is practicable to estimate that value. Fair value measurements and disclosures describe the fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, as follows:

 

 

The following tables present the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value using the lowest level input applicable to each financial instrument at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

 

 

The Company’s cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds that are measured on a recurring basis based on quoted market prices. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets, intangible assets,  accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued rebates, returns and discounts, asset acquisition obligations and term loan payable approximated their estimated fair values.

 

In connection with the Commercialization Agreement for the Nucynta Products, the Company recorded a liability of $482,300 representing the fair value of the future minimum royalty payments owed under the terms of the Commercialization Agreement.  The fair value of the minimum royalty payments was measured by calculating the present value of the minimum royalty payments using a discount rate of 5.7%. The discount rate is a Level 2 input which was based on a review of observable market data of similar liabilities. The liability associated with the future minimum royalty payments is included as a component of the intangible asset acquired and as a component of the obligations assumed in connection with the Commercialization Agreement, which is further described in Note 7.

 

 

6. Inventory

 

Inventory consisted of the following:

 

 

The aggregate charges related to excess inventory for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were immaterial. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the aggregate charges related to excess inventory were $257 and $350, respectively. These expenses were recorded as a component of cost of product revenues. 

 

 

 

7. Intangible Assets and Asset Acquisition Obligations

 

As of June 30, 2018, the Company’s only intangible asset related to the Company’s Commercialization Agreement with Depomed, pursuant to which Depomed agreed to grant a sublicense of certain of its intellectual property related to the Nucynta Products to the Company for commercialization of the Nucynta Products in the United States (the “Nucynta Intangible Asset”). The Company closed the transactions contemplated by the Commercialization Agreement, as amended, on January 9, 2018, and began marketing the Nucynta Products in February 2018.

 

Nucynta Intangible Asset

 

The Company determined that the Commercialization Agreement represented an asset acquisition, as substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in the sublicense of the Nucynta Products, which is a single identifiable asset or group. The consideration transferred in the asset acquisition was measured at cost, including transaction costs, assets transferred by the acquirer, and liabilities assumed by the acquirer.

 

The transaction resulted in the Company receiving the assets and assuming the liabilities noted below, which were recognized at cost as a component of intangible assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets upon acquisition:

 

 

The Company will amortize the Nucynta Intangible Asset over its useful life, which is the period over which the asset is expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the Company. The Company determined that the useful life for the intangible asset is approximately 4.0 years from the closing date of January 9, 2018.  The Company will recognize amortization expense as cost of product revenues in the Statement of Operations on a straight-line basis over its useful life as it approximates cash flows.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized amortization expense of $32,407 and $61,933, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, the remaining amortization period is approximately 3.5 years and estimated amortization for the remainder of 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 is expected to be $64,813,  $129,627,  $129,627, and $129,627, respectively.

 

As of June 30, 2018, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Nucynta Intangible Asset were as follows:

 

 

Nucynta Asset Acquisition Obligations

 

From January 9, 2018 through December 2021, under the terms of the Commercialization Agreement, the Company will be required to pay a minimum royalty of $135,000 per year, payable in quarterly payments of $33,750, prorated in 2018 for the closing date of January 9, 2018.  The total required minimum royalty payment from the closing date of January 9, 2018 through December 2021 is $537,000.  Payments are swept to Depomed daily based on proceeds received for Nucynta Product sales, and minimum payments are paid in full within 45 days of the quarter end.

 

Due to the nature of the obligation and fact that it will be settled in cash, the Company determined that the minimum royalty payments represented a liability incurred at the closing of the transaction and that the liability should be recorded at its fair value as of the closing date on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company calculated the fair value of the minimum royalty payments to be $482,300,  which was the calculated present value of the minimum royalty payments using a discount rate of 5.7%. The discount rate was determined based on a review of observable market data of similar liabilities. The Company will recognize the $54,700 discount as interest expense in the Statement of Operations using the effective interest method and will recognize the interest over the repayment period from January 9, 2018 through December 2021.

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018,  the Company recognized interest expense of $5,943 and $11,471, respectively, relating to the minimum royalty payments.  As of June 30, 2018, the remaining interest expense relating to the minimum royalty payments for the remainder of 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 is expected to be $10,912,  $17,138,  $10,907, and $4,272, respectively.

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company paid Depomed minimum royalty payments of $51,455 and $64,500, respectively.    

 

As of June 30, 2018, the remaining minimum royalty payments due under the Commercialization Agreement are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Onsolis Intangible Asset

 

In May 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc. (“BDSI”) to license the rights to develop, manufacture, and commercialize Onsolis® (fentanyl buccal soluble film), (“Onsolis”), in the United States. Onsolis is a Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl (“TIRF”) film indicated for the management of breakthrough pain in certain cancer patients.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made an upfront payment of $2,500 and recorded the payment as a component of intangible assets (the “Onsolis Intangible Asset”). On December 8, 2017, the Company, after a review of its product portfolio, provided written notice to BDSI of termination of the License and Development Agreement. The termination was effective pursuant to the terms of such agreement on March 8, 2018. Upon such termination of the License Agreement, the Company’s rights to develop and commercialize Onsolis reverted to BDSI. As a result of this notice of termination, the Company determined that the carrying amount of the intangible asset was not recoverable and that the carrying amount exceeded its fair value. As such, an impairment loss of $1,845 was recognized and included as a component of sales, general and administrative expense during the year ended December 31, 2017 and the net intangible asset is zero as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. 

 

Amortization Expense

 

Amortization expense relating to the Company’s intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

8. Accrued Expenses

 

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. Term Loan Payable 

On August 28, 2012, the Company entered into a loan agreement (“Original Term Loan”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) to borrow up to a maximum amount of $1,000. The Original Term Loan bore interest at a rate per annum of 2.25% above the prime rate fixed at the time of advance of the Original Term Loan (5.50%). The Original Term Loan was subsequently amended in 2014 and 2015 to provide for additional borrowings of up to $8,000, adjust the interest rate, extend the loan draw period, and modify loan covenants (as amended, the “Existing Term Loan”).  As of December 31, 2017, the future payments under the Existing Term Loan were $1,479.

In connection with, and as a condition to, consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Commercialization Agreement with Depomed, the Company entered into a Consent and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (the “Consent and Amendment”) with SVB to amend the Existing Term Loan. The Consent and Amendment provided the Company with a new term loan facility in an original principal amount of $11,500 (the “New Term Loan”), which replaced the Existing Term Loan and the proceeds of which were used by the Company to finance certain payment obligations under the Commercialization Agreement and to repay the balance of the Existing Term Loan. The Consent and Amendment also provided SVB’s consent with respect to transactions contemplated by the Commercialization Agreement, including the delivery by SVB of a standby letter of credit in an aggregate amount of $33,750. 

 

The New Term Loan bears interest at a rate per annum of 0.75% above the prime rate (as defined in the Consent and Amendment). The Company will repay the New Term Loan in equal consecutive monthly installments of principal plus monthly payments of accrued interest, commencing in July 2019, provided that, if the Company achieves EBITDA (as defined in the Consent and Amendment) in excess of $2,500 for two (2) consecutive calendar quarters prior to June 2019, such payments will commence in January 2020. All outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest under the New Term Loan, and all other outstanding obligations with respect to the New Term Loan, are due and payable in full in December 2022. The Company may prepay the New Term Loan, in full but not in part, with a prepayment fee of (i) 3.0% of the outstanding principal balance prior to the first anniversary of the Consent and Amendment, (ii) 2.0% of the outstanding principal balance following the first anniversary of the Consent and Amendment and prior to the second anniversary of the Consent and Amendment and (iii) 1.0% of the outstanding principal balance following the second anniversary of the Consent and Amendment, plus, in each case, a final payment fee of $719. The Company is required to refinance the New Term Loan on August 31, 2018.

 

Under the New Term Loan, the Company will be required to maintain a liquidity ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.0.  Any amounts outstanding during the continuance of any event of default under the New Term Loan will bear additional interest at the per annum rate of 5.0%.

 

As of June 30, 2018, scheduled principle repayments under the Company’s term loan are as follows:

 

 

 

10. Equity

 

The changes in shareholders’ equity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 were as follows:

 

 

 

11. Stock-based Compensation

 

A summary of the Company’s stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:

 

At June 30, 2018, there was approximately $34,073 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of approximately 2.6 years.

 

Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options 

 

In May 2015, the Company adopted the Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), under which an aggregate of 2,700,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance to employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of the Company, plus an annual increase on the first day of each fiscal year until the expiration of the Plan equal to 4% of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock on December 31st of the immediately preceding calendar year (or a lower amount as otherwise determined by the board of directors prior to January 1st). As of June 30, 2018, there were 1,139,189 shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to the Plan. The Plan provides for granting of both Internal Revenue Service qualified incentive stock options and non-qualified options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units. The Company’s equity awards generally vest ratably over a four  year period of service. The stock options generally have a ten  year contractual life and, upon termination, vested options are generally exercisable between one and three months following the termination date, while unvested options are forfeited immediately. 

 

In June 2018, the Company’s board of directors approved a modification to the former President and Chief Executive Officer’s equity-based awards to provide that all of those awards, to the extent unvested as of the Company’s 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, will vest on such date, subject to his continued service on the Company’s board of directors through such date. This modification was effective on June 4, 2018 and affected 116,250 shares of non-vested restricted stock units and 225,625 unvested stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock. This modification did not create incremental value as the fair value of these awards was unchanged. The shorter requisite service period will result in the accelerated recognition of stock-based compensation expense through 2020.

 

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and related information is as follows:

(1)Excludes activity from the early exercise of stock options. As of June 30, 2018, 12,072 shares of unvested restricted stock remain outstanding from the early exercise of stock options.

 

A summary of the Company’s restricted stock units activity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and related information is as follows:

 

 

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information follows:

 

 

 

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:

 

 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

The Company’s 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan allows employees to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price is equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price of our common stock on (1) the first day of the purchase period or (2) the last day of the purchase period. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, 50,151 shares of common stock were purchased for total proceeds of $510. The expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $120 and $108, respectively.  The expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $242 and $214, respectively. 

 

12. Commitments and Contingencies

 

From time to time, the Company may face legal claims or actions in the normal course of business. Except as disclosed below, the Company is not currently a party to any litigation and, accordingly, does not have any amounts recorded for any litigation related matters.

 

Xtampza Litigation 

   

The Company filed the NDA for Xtampza as a 505(b)(2) application, which allows the Company to reference data from an approved drug listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (commonly known as the Orange Book), in this case OxyContin OP. The 505(b)(2) process requires that the Company certifies to the FDA and notify Purdue Pharma, L.P (“Purdue”), as the holder of the NDA and any other Orange Book-listed patent owners, that the Company does not infringe any of the patents listed for OxyContin OP in the Orange Book, or that the patents are invalid. The Company made such certification and provided such notice on February 11, 2015 and such certification documented why Xtampza does not infringe any of the 11 Orange Book listed patents for OxyContin OP, five of which have been invalidated in court proceedings. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, Purdue had the option to sue the Company for infringement and receive a stay of up to 30 months before the FDA could issue a final approval for Xtampza ER, unless the stay was earlier terminated.

 

Purdue exercised its option and elected to sue the Company for infringement in the District of Delaware on March 24, 2015 asserting infringement of three of Purdue’s Orange Book-listed patents (Patent Nos. 7,674,799, 7,674,800, and 7,683,072) and a non-Orange Book-listed patent (Patent No. 8,652,497), and accordingly, received a 30-month stay of FDA approval.

   

The Delaware court transferred the case to the District of Massachusetts. After the Company filed a partial motion for judgment on the pleadings relating to the Orange Book-listed patents, the District Court of Massachusetts ordered judgment in the Company’s favor on those three patents, and dismissed the claims asserting infringement of those patents with prejudice. Upon dismissal of those claims, the 30-month stay of FDA approval was lifted. As a result, the Company was able to obtain final approval for Xtampza ER and launch the product commercially.

   

In November 2015, Purdue filed a follow-on suit asserting infringement of another patent, Patent No. 9,073,933. In June 2016, Purdue filed another follow-on suit asserting infringement of another non-Orange Book listed patent, Patent No. 9,155,717. In April 2017, Purdue filed another follow-on suit asserting infringement of another patent, Patent No. 9,522,919, which was late-listed in the Orange Book and therefore could not trigger any stay of FDA approval. Then, in September 2017, Purdue filed another follow-on suit asserting infringement of another non-Orange Book listed patent, Patent No. 9,693,961.

 

On March 13, 2018, the Company filed a Petition for Post-Grant Review (“PGR”) of the ʼ961 patent with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). The PGR argues that the ʼ961 patent is invalid for lack of a written description, for lack of enablement, for indefiniteness, and as being anticipated by prior art. Purdue filed its Patent Owner Preliminary Response on July 10, 2018. The PTAB will make its institution decision on or before October 10, 2018.

   

In October 2017, and in response to the filing of the Company’s Supplemental NDA (“sNDA”) seeking to update the drug abuse and dependence section of the Xtampza label, Purdue filed another suit asserting infringement of the ʼ933 and ʼ919 patent. The Company filed a motion to dismiss that action, and the Court granted its motion on January 16, 2018.

   

The current suits have been consolidated by the District of Massachusetts, where Purdue continues to assert infringement of five patents: the ʼ497 patent, the ʼ933 patent, the ʼ717 patent, the ʼ919 patent, and the ʼ961 patent. None of these suits are associated with any stay of FDA approval for Xtampza. Purdue has made a demand for monetary relief but has not quantified their alleged damages. Purdue has also requested a judgment of infringement, an adjustment of the effective date of FDA approval, and an injunction on the sale of the Company’s products accused of infringement. The Company has denied all claims and seeks a judgment that the patents are invalid and/or not infringed by the Company; the Company is also seeking a judgment that the case is exceptional, with an award to the Company of its fees for defending the case.

   

The parties are in the early stages of fact discovery. Written discovery has commenced with depositions expected to commence during the second half of 2018. A claim construction and summary judgment hearing was held on June 1, 2017. On November 21, 2017, the Court issued its claim construction ruling, construing certain claims of the ʼ933, ʼ497, and ʼ717 patents. At this time, the Motion for Summary Judgment, which asserted that claims of the ’933, ’497, and ’717 patents are invalid and not infringed, remains pending. The Company is not able to predict with certainty when the Court will decide the Company’s motion. The Scheduling Order has been amended to stay the close of fact discovery until after the Court decides our Motion for Summary Judgment. No trial date has been scheduled.

   

The Company is, and plans to continue, defending this case vigorously. At this stage, the Company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any.

 

Nucynta Litigation 

   

On February 7, 2018, Purdue filed a patent infringement suit against Collegium NF and the Company in the District of Delaware. Specifically, Purdue argues that the Company’s sale of immediate release and extended release Nucynta infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 9,861,583, 9,867,784, and 9,872,836. Purdue has made a demand for monetary relief in its Complaint but has not quantified its alleged damages. The Company filed its answer to the Complaint on April 9, 2018. Purdue filed its answer to the Company’s counterclaims on April 30, 2018. The Court adopted the parties’ proposed scheduling order on June 6, 2018. Fact and expert discovery will close on October 9, 2019 and March 18, 2020, respectively. The Court scheduled trial for September 28, 2020.

     

The Company plans to defend this case vigorously. At this stage, the Company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any.

   

Teva Litigation 

   

The Company has fourteen patents listed in the FDA Orange Book as covering the Company’s abuse-deterrent product and methods of using it to treat patients: Patents Nos.  7,399,488; 7,771,707; 8,449,909;  8,557,291;  8,758,813;  8,840,928;  9,044,398; 9,248,195;  9,592,200;  9,682,075; 9,737,530, 9,763,883; 9,968,598; 10,004,729 (the “Orange Book Patents”).

   

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva”) filed a Notice Letter of Patent Certification against twelve of the fourteen listed Orange Book Patents (the ’598 and ’729 patents were listed among the Orange Book Patents after receipt of Teva’s Notice Letter), alleging that they were invalid and/or not infringed by the proposed oxycodone products that are the subject of Teva’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”). On February 22, 2018—within the 45-day period that gives the Company a 30-month stay on FDA approval of Teva’s ANDA while the parties have an opportunity to litigate—the Company sued Teva in the District of Delaware on eleven of the Orange Book Patents. Teva responded to the Company’s complaint on May 14, 2018, alleging that the Orange Book Patents are invalid and are not infringed by